ÿþ<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>XII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL ABRALIC</TITLE><link rel=STYLESHEET type=text/css href=css.css></HEAD><BODY aLink=#ff0000 bgColor=#FFFFFF leftMargin=0 link=#000000 text=#000000 topMargin=0 vLink=#000000 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0><table align=center width=700 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr><td align=left bgcolor=#cccccc valign=top width=550><font face=arial size=2><strong><font face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif size=3><font size=1>XII CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL ABRALIC</font></font></strong><font face=Verdana size=1><b><br></b></font><font face=Verdana, Arial,Helvetica, sans-serif size=1><strong> </strong></font></font></td><td align=right bgcolor=#cccccc valign=top width=150><font face=arial size=2><strong><font face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif size=1><font size=1>Resumo:1038-1</font></em></font></strong></font></td></tr><tr><td colspan=2><br><br><table align=center width=700><tr><td><b>Oral (Tema Livre)</b><br><table width="100%"><tr><td width="60">1038-1</td><td><b>Vanguard Politics, Populist Poetics: Reflections on Avant-Garde Manifestos in Latin America </b></td></tr><tr><td valign=top>Autores:</td><td><u>Bruno Carvalho </u> (PU - Princeton University) </td></tr></table><p align=justify><b><font size=2>Resumo</font></b><p align=justify class=tres><font size=2>If the manifesto as a genre shifted from the political to the artistic sphere during the beginning of the twentieth century, both would remain intricately connected in Latin America s vanguard movements of the 1920s and 30s. Several literary figures central to the region s avant-gardes either founded or joined  radical political parties, among them Vicente Huidobro, Pablo Neruda, Manuel Maples Arce, Mário de Andrade, Nicolás Guillén, Luís Palés Matos, Arturo Uslar Pietri, Menotti del Picchia and José Carlos Mariátegui, to name but a few. Many of these writers stood on the losing side of electoral or political disputes, not unlike many of their European counterparts. Significant portions of their artistic projects and literary works, nonetheless, were incorporated into  official national literatures, frequently during regimes opposed by them. How then, we must ask, did Latin American avant-garde writers adapt to shifting political realities that emerged in the wake of their aesthetic innovations? And conversely, how did new political regimes appropriate practices developed by these same avant-gardes? This paper will approach this question through focus on the analysis of intersections between populist discourses, manifestos, and advertisement.</font></p></td></tr></table></tr></td></table></body></html>